Aream Suam logo AREAM SUAM

Fallback languages

Also show articles in these languages when not translated.

1 EN English

Preferences saved

Magna Quaestio

The Great Question

Magna Quaestio

Burke’s Conclave Dinner and the Price of Catholic Cowardice

Conservative cardinals reportedly helped elect Prevost. A year later, Rome turns away traditional pilgrims.

In this article by Chris Jackson—a piece that is simultaneously well-informed and completely wide of the mark—we find confirmation of a shocking development: the outcome of the 2025 conclave was allegedly settled over a dinner hosted by Cardinal Burke. It should be recalled that Burke is arguably one of the (true) cardinals most conversant with the Magna Quaestio. Instead of defending the rights of the Apostolic See—as Universi Dominici Gregis mandates him to do—he has chosen to trade them away in exchange for liturgical concessions. The munus in exchange for Latin! 'Conservatives' are sorely misguided to place their trust in such traitors, who, by this very act, incur latae sententiae excommunication (UDG, no. 81).

Source : Hiraeth In Exile
Magna Quaestio

Charles Murr on one of Spain's most-watched podcasts: «John Paul I died two hours after attempting to remove Baggio»

… And Benedict XVI was forced to retire by the same hidden forces.

An essential read: truly exceptional testimony—from a witness who is today the sole survivor and who has preserved remarkable freedom of expression—on the importance of Freemasonry in the Vatican and on various events, beginning with the assassination of John Paul I and the departure—forced, according to his account—of Benedict XVI.

Source : Infovaticana
Magna Quaestio

Election of Leo XIV was the next step in the ‘St. Gallen revolution’

Anyone wishing to gain a clearer understanding of the attacks on the true faith in our time need only look at the telling statements of the St. Gallen Mafia.

Pastor Unterhalt thoroughly dismantles two arguments that have become commonplace: the claim that every element of the ongoing revolution at the Vatican emerged almost spontaneously, without any pre-established plan; and the claim that all of this falls within the lineage of Vatican II and the conciliar popes. It is abundantly clear that the impostors clad in white—first 'Francis' and then 'Leo'—are precisely following the agenda devised by Martini and the 'St. Gallen Group,' which seized power by ousting Benedict XVI.

Source : Communio Veritatis
Magna Quaestio

The Resignation of Benedict XVI

A Carnival Jest

In these days, much is being said about the new book by Msgr. Viganò, in which the authoritative spokesman for the FSSPX writes that all «postconciliar popes are in a state of schism with the papacy» and considers them «enemies of the papacy». Personally, I consider John Paul II and Benedict XVI to be saints, and I strongly advise Viganò’s anti-papal and anti-council adversaries not to read this article. I have already addressed the issue of Benedict XVI’s resignation in my 2025 book, but since the Chair of Peter continues to be occupied abusively amid the total indifference of cardinals and bishops—including Viganò—it is by no means superfluous to revisit the topic.

Source : Aream Suam
Magna Quaestio

The Letters 124 and 126 in Which St. Bernard of Clairvaux 'Photographed' the 2013 Coup d'État

Here is a concise summary (384 characters): Based on the letters of Saint Bernard defending the rights of Pope Innocent II against the antipope Anaclet (1130), Andrea Cionci draws a parallel with 2013: Benedict XVI not having renounced the Petrine 'munus,' his pontificate remained valid. The election of Francis was therefore canonically null. He was, like Anaclet, and as the antipope Leo is today, his successor, a usurper, for there can be only one pope at a time.

Source : Codice Ratzinger
Magna Quaestio

Vatican probe into Benedict’s resignation still live: Cionci faces second hearing

There are new developments in the active Vatican court case looking into allegations that the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI was not valid.

There are new developments in the active Vatican court case looking into allegations that the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI was not valid and thus calling into question the pontificates of Francis and Leo XIV.

Source : LifeSiteNews