Tags
#Tag
The woman identified as ‘Agnes’ in Malachi Martin’s ‘Windswept House’ has come forward with a firsthand account of alleged satanic ritual abuse by the late cardinal.
I met her in real life last week.
Last week I (Fr. David Nix) had a four hour dinner with Bernardin’s victim and her husband. She is now 80 years old. The Satanic Ritual Abuse happened to her about 70 years ago by Fr. Joseph Bernardin (later Cardinal Archbishop of Chicago, top-left.) The abuse happened at St. Mary’s Church in Greenville, SC (top-right.)
Archbishop Viganò describes here very well the double game of the actors in this deplorable affair: from the Vatican, which excludes in the most blatant way possible the Tradition so that the Latin liturgy no longer has the right of citizenship at Saint Peter's, to the organizers and leaders who abandoned the flock to its fate, in order to instrumentalize the event to their own advantage.
Conservative cardinals reportedly helped elect Prevost. A year later, Rome turns away traditional pilgrims.
In this article by Chris Jackson—a piece that is simultaneously well-informed and completely wide of the mark—we find confirmation of a shocking development: the outcome of the 2025 conclave was allegedly settled over a dinner hosted by Cardinal Burke. It should be recalled that Burke is arguably one of the (true) cardinals most conversant with the Magna Quaestio. Instead of defending the rights of the Apostolic See—as Universi Dominici Gregis mandates him to do—he has chosen to trade them away in exchange for liturgical concessions. The munus in exchange for Latin! 'Conservatives' are sorely misguided to place their trust in such traitors, who, by this very act, incur latae sententiae excommunication (UDG, no. 81).
Anyone wishing to gain a clearer understanding of the attacks on the true faith in our time need only look at the telling statements of the St. Gallen Mafia.
Pastor Unterhalt thoroughly dismantles two arguments that have become commonplace: the claim that every element of the ongoing revolution at the Vatican emerged almost spontaneously, without any pre-established plan; and the claim that all of this falls within the lineage of Vatican II and the conciliar popes. It is abundantly clear that the impostors clad in white—first 'Francis' and then 'Leo'—are precisely following the agenda devised by Martini and the 'St. Gallen Group,' which seized power by ousting Benedict XVI.
John Cavadini, appointed by Benedict as a member of the International Theological Commission, signed in 2022 the claim that Summorum Pontificum undermined the hermeneutic of continuity. He will receive the prize from the Pope on 19 December
A Carnival Jest
In these days, much is being said about the new book by Msgr. Viganò, in which the authoritative spokesman for the FSSPX writes that all «postconciliar popes are in a state of schism with the papacy» and considers them «enemies of the papacy». Personally, I consider John Paul II and Benedict XVI to be saints, and I strongly advise Viganò’s anti-papal and anti-council adversaries not to read this article. I have already addressed the issue of Benedict XVI’s resignation in my 2025 book, but since the Chair of Peter continues to be occupied abusively amid the total indifference of cardinals and bishops—including Viganò—it is by no means superfluous to revisit the topic.
The lives of their children are at stake
Female prefects now govern religious orders and help choose bishops. Mallorca stages dance inside the Assumption liturgy while Belgium sends Rome a Pride-marching ambassador.
Italian headline writers have been reaching for the phrase so often that it has become almost tedious. Still, they have seen something many Catholic commentators prefer to soften. A structural change is underway in Rome, and Leo has spent the first fifteen months of his reign making it durable
Here is a concise summary (384 characters): Based on the letters of Saint Bernard defending the rights of Pope Innocent II against the antipope Anaclet (1130), Andrea Cionci draws a parallel with 2013: Benedict XVI not having renounced the Petrine 'munus,' his pontificate remained valid. The election of Francis was therefore canonically null. He was, like Anaclet, and as the antipope Leo is today, his successor, a usurper, for there can be only one pope at a time.
A strong voice, thoughtful and capable of inspiring thought
