A ceremony under the sign of ambiguity
On June 13, 2026, in Brazil but in the shadow of the prophecies of Fatima, the Roman hierarchy is preparing to perform an act of vertiginous ambiguity: the elevation to the altars of Father Nazareno Lanciotti. For the Marial Priestly Movement (MPM), this is the recognition of a martyr. But for the attentive observer, this ceremony resembles the "kiss of Judas": a liturgical homage rendered by an institution that the missionary himself, through the messages of the Blue Book, designated as infiltrated and misguided. By crowning a denouncer, is Rome seeking conversion or attempting the ultimate maneuver of recovery to defuse a truth that has become too burning?
A missionary facing the "wolves"
Born in Rome in 1940, Nazareno Lanciotti became a missionary in Brazil. Appointed in 1972 to Jaurú, in Mato Grosso, he transformed this disinherited region over three decades, building hospitals, schools, and training centers, and founding fifty-seven rural communities centered on daily Eucharistic adoration.
But it was another battle that cost him his life: Lanciotti openly opposed the networks of drug trafficking and prostitution that ravaged the local youth.
On February 11, 2001, he was shot in his parish house and died on February 22, the feast of the Chair of St. Peter; a sign for the one who was the national director of the MPM in Brazil and a staunch defender of the integrity of the Gospel.
The ‘Blue Book’, a surgical diagnosis of the crisis
To understand the scope of this beatification, we must go back to the source: Don Stefano Gobbi.
In 1972, in Fatima, the Italian priest Stefano Gobbi received during a pilgrimage what he describes as interior locutions from the Virgin Mary. These messages did not cease until 1997 — twenty-five years of words received, noted, disseminated, gathered in what would become one of the most read spiritual books of the 20th century Catholic: To My Priests, Beloved Sons of My Sorrow — the Blue Book.
This text constitutes a diagnosis of the ecclesiastical crisis of remarkable precision, articulated around three major themes:
The consecration of Russia: an unanswered request
On March 25, 1984, John Paul II consecrated the world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Russia was not named directly. On the same day, message 287 of the Blue Book states:
“Particular circumstances have not yet allowed the explicit consecration of Russia that I have requested... this consecration will be made to me when the bloody events are well underway.”
Lanciotti spread these texts at the price of strong institutional hostility, refusing to believe that the mere collapse of the Soviet bloc was sufficient to validate the promise of Russia's conversion. It is undoubtedly also for this reason that he was instrumentalized by Bergoglio, who declared him ‘Venerable’ on April 14, 2025.
Ecclesiastical Freemasonry: the internal enemy
In the June 1989 trilogy — three consecutive messages that count among the most commented on in the Blue Book — Our Lady deploys the image of the two Beasts of the Apocalypse (chapter 13) to describe the forces at work against the Church:
The first beast is identified with Freemasonry — acting from the outside, seeking to weaken the Church through culture, politics, social pressure.
The second beast is internal, the ‘ecclesiastical Freemasonry’ — infiltrated among the hierarchy, ‘up to the top’, wearing the appearances of piety while working for the destruction of the faith.
“The Beast with two horns, similar to a lamb, indicates Freemasonry infiltrated within the Church, that is, ecclesiastical Freemasonry, which has spread especially among the members of the Hierarchy. This Masonic infiltration [...] has already been predicted to you by me at Fatima, when I announced to you that Satan would enter even to the top of the Church.” (message 406 of June 13, 1989)
It is this second Beast that evokes Pope Benedict XVI, on May 13, 2010, in Fatima: "As for the novelties that we can discover today in this message (the ‘Third Secret’), there is also the fact that not only from the outside are the attacks against the Pope and against the Church, but the sufferings of the Church come precisely from within the Church, from the sin that exists in the Church."
The program of this infiltration is precise: to build a false Christ and a false Church, to promote an empty ecumenism, to justify sin through the progressive relativization of Catholic morality, and to empty the Eucharist of its sacrificial meaning and its supernatural reality.
Apostasy and the abomination of desolation
Message 362, dated September 15, 1987 — the feast of Our Lady of Sorrows — carries a gravity that has not aged:
“I weep because the Church continues on the path of division, the loss of true faith, apostasy... the man of iniquity will establish himself in it, and the abomination of desolation will enter the holy temple of God.”
Exactly what we have been witnessing since 2013.
The choice of a highly symbolic date
The acceleration by Leo XIV of the beatification process raises questions. Why this haste to honor a priest whose Catholicism seems at odds with the agenda of Querida Amazonia and the ‘Pachamamania’ dear to Bergoglio and Robert Prevost?
The choice of June 13 is far from arbitrary.
It is, of course, the date of the second apparition of the Cova da Iria, with the revelation of the Immaculate Heart of Mary to the three children of Fatima.
Was not the motto of Father Nazareno: “Immaculate Heart of Mary, trust, salvation, and my victory”?
But this date is also that of the apparition of June 13, 1929, to Sister Lucia in Tuy (Spain), during which Our Lady asks... the consecration of Russia!
“It has come the moment in which God asks the Holy Father to make, in union with all the bishops of the world, the consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart, promising to save it by this means.”
As we know, Sister Lucia insisted much on this theme, writing in 1940: "The Good God promises to put an end to the persecution in Russia, if the Holy Father deigns to make, and orders the bishops of the Catholic world to make as well, a solemn and public act of reparation and consecration of Russia to the Most Holy Hearts of Jesus and Mary, and if His Holiness the pope promises, in exchange for the end of this persecution, to approve and recommend the practice of the reparatory devotion of the first five Saturdays of the month."
A double-edged neutralization maneuver?
One cannot help but think that this is, as always on the part of ecclesiastical Freemasonry, to recover, defuse Fatima, to divert its meaning; but in this case, there is more: by emphasizing the fact that the consecration carried out by Pope John Paul II was insufficient, one brings to the fore that carried out by ‘Francis’ on March 25, 2022, on the feast of the Annunciation.
All this suggests a triple strategy:
• Defuse Fatima: By beatifying Lanciotti on the anniversary of the apparition of Tuy, the institution claims to have finally closed the Fatima dossier via the act of pseudo-consecration by ‘Francis’ in March 2022, rendering obsolete the criticisms of the ‘Blue Book’ at the same time.
• Reward the MPM: The persistent silence of the movement in the face of the crisis of legitimacy of the current ‘Roman pontiff’, designated successor of a heretical antipope, and in the face of current doctrinal deviations, is questionable. A silence all the more surprising in that the reading of the Blue Book should push its members to ask some serious questions about the concordance between the warnings of their founder and current developments. This beatification looks very much like a ‘reward’ for the benevolent neutrality of its members towards the Vatican system.
• Make a pastoral counterfire: This is clearly a seduction operation towards ‘traditionalist’ Catholics tempted by the schism of the FSSPX, scheduled two weeks later, on July 1st, while at the same time sweeping under the rug the missionary resistances to Rome's Amazonian agenda.
Conclusion: The homage that seals the silence
Beatifying the main Brazilian herald of the warnings about the ‘false Church’ is a masterstroke of Vatican politics, a form of ecclesiastical kiss of Judas. One embraces the saint to better stifle his cry under the weight of flowers and liturgical ornaments. By depriving Lanciotti's message of its subversive charge, the hierarchy attempts to transform an apocalyptic warning into a harmless, mute stained-glass devotion.
Yet the paradox remains and judges those who organize it: if Father Nazareno is recognized as Blessed for having defended and transmitted the prophecies of the Blue Book, those who today occupy the ‘first seats’ implicitly recognize themselves as the targets of his denunciations. By ignoring the substance of his testimony, the institution only confirms the apostasy he predicted. Without a total surrender to the Truth that the martyr sealed with his blood, this beatification will be just another parody in a Church that rings desperately empty, despite the facade crowds.
