Today we look at two more examples of what the woke folk claiming to be Catholic are getting up to in the satanic Synodal Nut House.
Why? Because the frequency and bizarre nature of what is taking place in the name of Catholicism should tell you, and those you are trying to wake from their tragic slumber, exactly where the Synodal Church is going. If this was some Protestant sect getting up to these antics (and yes, one could call the Synodal Church a neo-Protestant sect), I would have yawned and continued with my life. But that is what is so infuriating. They are doing this in the name of the Church Christ founded, and in the process leading millions astray.
First we take a look at a return customer: Georg Bätzing, the “Bishop” of Limburg and former chairman of the German Bishops’ Conference. His recent comments at the Frankfurt Press Club revealed all the theological confusion that reigns supreme not only in the German episcopate, but in the Synodal Church as a whole. His speech, a paean to the Synodal religion, was peppered with the usual language of “participation,” “transparency,” and “shared decision-making.” But, as usual, the blasphemy was never far from the surface.
Bätzing boldly claimed that the Church has no future without the kind of synodality he proposes. See where this is going? As in Protestantism, every Tom, Dick, and Harry with a collar or a cape will interpret synodalism his (and soon her) way, resulting in profound demonic confusion.
Besides that, there is something extremely blasphemous about this claim. This statement cannot be dismissed as mere rhetorical exaggeration. The Church does not possess a future in the way a human institution does, dependent on adaptation or reform in order to survive. She endures because she was founded by Jesus Christ and is sustained by His divine promise. When Christ declared that the gates of hell would not prevail against His Church, He did not attach conditions based on historical circumstances or pastoral strategies. The endurance of the Church is not contingent upon the success of particular structures or models of governance. Bätzing is thus saying that it is not Christ that will ensure the Church’s future, but the wicked invention that is synodality. This is once again further proof that the Synodal Church is not Christ’s Church but one of human initiative. For this German heretic to suggest that the Catholic Church’s future depends upon a new form of participation is to speak as though she were a purely historical organism, subject to the same laws of decline and renewal as any human society. This is cleverly masked blasphemy, whether his mind is so rotten that he knows it or not, does not matter. What is important is that you need to take note that this is the mindset of the people who have hijacked the Catholic Church’s name and reputation.
Elsewhere during his remarks, Bätzing demanded that “what concerns everyone should be decided by everyone.” This idea carries an immediate appeal in an age shaped by fallacious democratic sensibilities, but it is irreconcilable with the Catholic understanding of authority. A Church in which truth and governance arise from the sinful collective will of its members will be a church ruled by Satan, and this is exactly where the synodal church is heading, and openly so.
Authority descends from Christ through the Apostles to their successors. Any other so-called “model” is from the pits of hell. The faithful possess genuine dignity and real participation in the life of the Catholic Church, yet this participation is ordered toward reception and witness rather than legislation. The deposit of faith is not a subject for negotiation, nor is moral truth something to be determined by those who “feel its effects”.
PLEASE DONATE HERE IF YOU VALUE MY WORK
This principle introduces a fundamentally subjective criterion into the life of the Synodal Church, where questions of doctrine and discipline are tied to personal or communal experience rather than revelation. One is left to ask who determines who is affected and by what standard decisions are to be made. The logic leads inevitably toward a form of relativism that resembles less the Catholic religion than the ecclesial models that emerged from the Protestant Rebellion, where authority became dispersed and doctrine increasingly subject to reinterpretation.
Now let us move on to the second incident that shows that the Synodal religion is the handiwork of the devil.
According to a media report, a recent event in southern Italy has caused a minor furore after an imam was invited to speak inside a Catholic church, presenting Islam to parishioners.
Yes, read that again. The church was not “lent” to the imam as a venue to address Muslims, which would have been unacceptable anyway, but he was invited to effectively promote his religion to the “Catholic” congregation.
Believe it or not, it gets worse.
The event took place in the parish of San Lorenzo da Brindisi in the Diocese of Brindisi-Ostuni, with the support and presence of Giovanni Intini, the local “bishop”, who also closed the gathering! This was sanctioned by the man who is supposed to protect his flock and thrust upon the parishioners in the name of “interreligious dialogue”. This shows precisely why it should be rejected. What is next? A priest from the Church of Satan? After all, why not, if all religions lead to God?
According to reports the initiative did not consist of a reciprocal exchange, but rather a one-sided presentation of another religion within a consecrated Catholic space. What was described as dialogue lacked the essential element of mutual witness. There was no corresponding presentation of Catholic doctrine, no clear articulation of the faith in response, but rather a posture in which the faithful were placed in the position of listeners to another religious system.
Islam is the religion of subjugation, and boy are the Synodal hierarchy keen to assist it in subjugating the Synodal Church’s members to this false religion!
One final dark irony needs to be noted about this sordid affair. The parish is dedicated to St. Lawrence of Brindisi, a saint known for his intellectual defense of the faith and his role in encouraging Christian resistance during conflicts with the Ottoman Turks. Hardly a figure of confusion or accommodation when it comes to Islam. This incident was not only offensive to God, but also to the memory of this precious saint. At this point the synodal heretics are openly mocking Christ and the Catholic Church.
I guess this is just the natural progression of similar initiatives elsewhere which are becoming more and more frequent, including the hosting of Ramadan meals in churches and participation in Islamic observances by clergy, The logic is not hard to follow. First you eat with them, then you legitimise their religion, and then you allow them to “preach” in your parishes. Inevitably you will worship their “god”.
This is the final aim and destination of synodalism and ecumenism.
