Yet another pathetic attempt by the false Bergoglian cardinals to try to confuse you and patch together the impossible canonical legitimacy of Bergoglio. The game unfolds in the two phases provided by the conclave voting: first the total number of ballots is counted, and then the scrutiny, that is, the reading of names on them and the counting of votes for the candidates.

Antonio Socci wrote in 2014 a bestseller that made waves, "Not Francis", contesting the legitimacy of Bergoglio's election. He had based this on an episode recounted in Elisabetta Piquet's book "Francis, Life and Revolution". Bergoglio would have been elected on the fifth vote of the day (the sixth overall), while the regulations provide for a maximum of four scrutinies per day.

Indeed, during the counting of one vote, two ballots had been found stuck together, thus one ballot more than the number of electors. The cardinals had annulled that scrutiny, burned the ballots and immediately proceeded to a new vote.

According to Socci, this was not permitted by the rules and would have rendered the entire procedure null due to formal defect. Indeed, art. 69 of the Universi Dominici Gregis prescribes that if during the scrutiny phase two ballots are found stuck together, the vote must not be annulled. If one ballot is completed and the other is blank, the only name appearing is counted. If two different names appear on each ballot, both are zeroed out.

According to Socci, given that the voting had been annulled contrary to art. 69, consequently Bergoglio's election never existed juridically.

An absolutely inconsistent thesis, because art. 68 of the Universi clearly specifies that if the extra ballot is found during the counting phase (as Piquet had also explained), the vote must be annulled. It matters little that the ballots were stuck together; what matters is that the extra ballot was found during the counting phase and not during scrutiny. Therefore Bergoglio's election would certainly not have been affected by this matter of the "fifth irregular vote" which, nonetheless, had made quite a stir at the time, casting shadows on Bergoglio's canonical legitimacy.

Thus, today, the false Bergoglian cardinals have found a way to "patch it up" retroactively by reviving the pitiful scenario of the double ballot. Even if they were smeared with glue, these blessed ballots. Here is what Piquet recounts, regarding the 2025 conclave, in her new book "The Last Conclave" (translated from Spanish): "Incredibly, the same thing happens that occurred in the fifth vote of the 2013 conclave, precisely as I wrote in my book on the election of Pope Francis. At the moment of counting, something is amiss: instead of 133 ballots, there are 134!

The third scrutineer, cardinal Filoni, verifies and informs the other cardinals of the error. Immediately afterward, cardinal Parolin, following the constitution, declares the scrutiny null without reading any of the names on the ballots, which will be burned without being opened at the end of the afternoon voting.

As happened in 2013, two ballots remained stuck together… On this occasion we know the "culprit": Spanish cardinal Carlos Osoro Sierra, archbishop emeritus of Madrid—who will turn eighty just eight days later—, publicly acknowledges his mistake in inadvertently depositing his ballot stuck to another. Highly embarrassed, he asks forgiveness of the other cardinals and requests two new ballots".

See? They had to replicate the staging to reiterate to the public that the annulment of the fifth vote of 2013 had been in the counting phase and therefore was absolutely legitimate. A pitiful maneuver to manipulate consciences, but now deployed beyond the window of opportunity. The question of the impeded see is setting the entire world ablaze.

Paradoxically, the 2013 conclave proceeded perfectly; the only detail that the plotters had not considered was that Benedict XVI was not an abdicatarian, but impeded. His Declaratio was never an abdication; it was falsified by card. Tarcisio Bertone, then Secretary of State, and by Msgr. Giampiero Gänswein, as admitted by Msgr. Gänswein in the volume "Nothing But the Truth".

The two prelates were challenged with public petitions by over 2000 faithful and they did not deny it. The writer has also filed a complaint with the Vatican Criminal Tribunal and the Promoter of Justice recently made it known that investigations are underway, and at least since April 12, 2025, when the writer was questioned as a witness.

Therefore, an abusive conclave convoked with a pope impeded = Bergoglio antipope. Prevost, elected by the false cardinals created by antipope Bergoglio is also antipope. Everything the two antipopes did is null, it never existed. End of the matter.

Now it will be necessary to file a complaint also regarding the episode of false cardinal Osoro Sierra, so that it be instructive for all those who wish to continue mocking the faithful.

In the meantime, all readers are invited to sign the collective notice of default to the Holy See. The true cardinals, duly bound by art. 3 UDG to intervene to remove antipope Leo, are not yet realizing the financial disaster that awaits the Vatican when foreign concordat States receive the authentic declaration of Benedict XVI: everything null and invalid starting from 2013. And there will be quite a few funds to return.

© Reproduction reserved